Seminars in Hematology
Volume 46, Issue 2 , Pages 133-142, April 2009

Frontline Treatment in Elderly Patients With Multiple Myeloma

  • Thierry Facon

      Affiliations

    • Service des Maladies du Sang, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Lille, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Thierry Facon, MD, Service des Maladies du Sang, Hôpital Claude Huriez, CHU, rue Michel Polonovski, 59037 Lille, France
  • ,
  • Jesus San Miguel

      Affiliations

    • Hospital Clinico Universitario, Salamanca, Spain
  • ,
  • Maria Victoria Mateos

      Affiliations

    • Hospital Clinico Universitario, Salamanca, Spain
  • ,
  • Cyrille Hulin

      Affiliations

    • Service de Médecine Interne-Hématologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Vandoeuvre, France

Melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide (MPT) and melphalan-prednisone-bortezomib (MPV) currently appear to be the treatments of choice for a large proportion of elderly multiple myeloma (MM) patients ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). It seems certain that in the near future cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone, with an attenuated dose of dexamethasone (CTDa), and melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide (MPR) will also be proved superior to MP, thus providing four therapeutic options in this patient group. These options could lead to more personalized treatment approaches, based on patient comorbidities, as the three novel agents have somewhat different toxicity profiles. MP would be appropriate for only a minority of patients with poor performance status and/or significant comorbidities. Questions regarding the relative efficacy of different melphalan-based regimens or melphalan-based regimens versus dexamethasone-based regimens with low-dose dexamethasone will require further trials. Additionally, the important issue of maintenance treatment needs to be investigated. These new and emerging therapies provide multiple effective treatment options for MM patients and greatly enhanced treatment strategies for clinicians, all offering promise that has been sorely lacking over the past four decades.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0037-1963(09)00030-4

doi:10.1053/j.seminhematol.2009.02.002

Seminars in Hematology
Volume 46, Issue 2 , Pages 133-142, April 2009