Seminars in Hematology
Volume 45, Issue 3 , Pages 141-149, July 2008

Bayesian Interpretation and Analysis of Research Results

  • Sander Greenland

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Sander Greenland, Department of Epidemiology and Department of Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772.

Department of Epidemiology and Department of Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.

From a computational perspective, Bayesian methods can be viewed as a natural extension of familiar confidence intervals and significance tests, which sheds light on their meaning. This viewpoint shows that no special software is required to compute Bayesian results, leaving the distinctions between conventional and Bayesian analyses in the conceptual realm. Key Bayesian concepts may be grasped more easily than those required for proper use of conventional methods. These concepts allow one to re-examine results from a Bayesian perspective, to complement and prevent misinterpretation of conventional results. Thus, even if frequentist results remain the norm for presentation, the inclusion of Bayesian perspectives in teaching and analysis is strongly recommended.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0037-1963(08)00063-2

doi:10.1053/j.seminhematol.2008.04.004

Seminars in Hematology
Volume 45, Issue 3 , Pages 141-149, July 2008