Seminars in Hematology
Volume 45, Issue 3 , Pages 176-180, July 2008

Interpreting the Results of Systematic Reviews

  • Mike Clarke

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Mike Clarke, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, 24 D'Olier St, Dublin 2, Ireland.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Systematic reviews are increasingly common and often provide the most robust research approach to informed decisions about health care. The successful interpretation of systematic reviews for decisions about health care requires consideration of their quality and judgement on whether the participants and the interventions assessed are applicable to a different setting. This chapter includes a table of questions to help the reader consider this issue. If a review satisfies the requirements of the present setting, the benefits and harms of the interventions, along with other information including patient preferences, will help the clinician decide what the review “means” and what to do about this in practice.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0037-1963(08)00061-9

doi:10.1053/j.seminhematol.2008.04.002

Seminars in Hematology
Volume 45, Issue 3 , Pages 176-180, July 2008