Seminars in Hematology
Volume 43, Issue 4 , Pages 221-229, October 2006

Dose-Intensified Treatment of Advanced-Stage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas

  • Gerhard Held

      Affiliations

    • Innere Medizin I, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg, Germany.
  • ,
  • Joerg Schubert

      Affiliations

    • Innere Medizin I, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg, Germany.
  • ,
  • Marcel Reiser

      Affiliations

    • Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Klinikum der Universität zu Köln, Cologne, Germany.
  • ,
  • Michael Pfreundschuh

      Affiliations

    • Innere Medizin I, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg, Germany.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Michael Pfreundschuh, MD, Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Saarland University Medical School, D-66421 Homburg (Saar), Germany.
  • ,
  • German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin-Lymphoma Study Group

The introduction of the CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) regimen 30 years ago was the great breakthrough in the treatment of advanced-stage aggressive lymphomas. About 50% of all patients treated with CHOP achieved complete remission, and about one third experienced long-term disease-free survival and cure. Attempts to improve results by modifications of CHOP using escalated doses, additional drugs, or the alternative use of putatively non–cross-resistant chemotherapy regimens were not confirmed in randomized trials. With the availability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and the tool of autologous stem cell support in the 1990s, dose escalation, dose densification (by interval reduction), or combinations thereof were pursued to increase dose intensity. While dose-escalation strategies, including high-dose approaches necessitating stem cell support, have not been demonstrated unequivocally yet to be superior to a baseline CHOP-21, dose-dense (biweekly) modifications improved the outcome of young and elderly patients with aggressive lymphomas compared to baseline CHOP-21. The challenges in the era of the monoclonal antibody rituximab are the identification of the ideal chemotherapy partner for rituximab both with respect to potential synergistic effects and to the lack of interference with its effector mechanisms. Finally, the issue of intensifying rituximab within such approaches must be addressed by appropriately designed randomized trials.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe.

PII: S0037-1963(06)00151-X

doi:10.1053/j.seminhematol.2006.07.003

Seminars in Hematology
Volume 43, Issue 4 , Pages 221-229, October 2006