Seminars in Hematology
Volume 42, Issue 4 , Pages 259-265, October 2005

Clinical Trials in Myeloproliferative Disorders: Looking Forward

  • Roberto Marchioli

      Affiliations

    • Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Via Nazionale, Chieti, Italy.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Roberto Marchioli, MD, Laboratory of Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Epidemiology, Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Via Nazionale, 8, 66030 Santa Maria Imbaro, Chieti, Italy.
  • ,
  • Guido Finazzi

      Affiliations

    • Division of Hematology, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo, Italy.
  • ,
  • Rosa Maria Marfisi

      Affiliations

    • Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Via Nazionale, Chieti, Italy.
  • ,
  • Gianni Tognoni

      Affiliations

    • Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Via Nazionale, Chieti, Italy.
  • ,
  • Tiziano Barbui

      Affiliations

    • Division of Hematology, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo, Italy.

Although far from perfect, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are the best mechanism available for evaluating the risk/benefit profile of a particular therapy. Given this, it is particularly unfortunate that there have been few clinical trials of therapy for myeloproliferative diseases (MPDs) as these therapies are often based on agents with unclear long-term safety. A complex profile of MPD uncertainties requires a simple, but articulated strategy of care and research to allow a reasonable transfer of the best available validated knowledge and a timely investigation of the most relevant questions. The multi-country, collaborative RCTs are key to generating valid data. The prerequisite for success is the close interaction of the clinical community and the research community studying the same patients. Data to be collected, criteria, contents, frequency of follow-up, and documentation of the events should be as similar as possible to those used in routine clinical care. One of the greatest achievements of the multicenter trials with this orientation has been to produce a “core” of data and practices, on which the main analyses will be made, but which at the same time reflect an optimal level of patient care for the majority of patients.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0037-1963(05)00081-8

doi:10.1053/j.seminhematol.2005.05.021

Seminars in Hematology
Volume 42, Issue 4 , Pages 259-265, October 2005